Invent/gitlab, issues and bugzilla

[Ilmari Lauhakangas]

Nate Graham kirjoitti 3.7.2019 klo 21.23:
> On 7/3/19 11:53 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> If the new is much better than the old, let's just remove the old.
>>
>> As said, having two things that do the same is just confusing for 
>> everyone.
> 
> I would tend to agree, and having two is super confusing. In general, 
> people who have reported bugs on both Bugzilla and GitHub or GitLab seem 
> to agree that Bugzilla's UX is inferior. However I don't believe we've 
> officially trialed GitLab Issues and investigated what missing features 
> need to be added before we can migrate to it. Maybe the time to do that 
> is now, as a part of the general GitLab evaluation and migration period.
> 
> Personally I find GitLab Issues to offer a vastly superior UX for bug 
> reporting compared to Bugzilla. However the UX for bug management and 
> triaging is not as granular. For example I still haven't figured out a 
> way to create a saved search for "all Issues opened in the last 24 hours 
> across all projects". And it would be nice to have some kind of overview 
> similar to https://bugs.kde.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi.

The upcoming Bugzilla version 6 will have a vastly superior UX to BZ 5: 
https://github.com/bugzilla/bugzilla-ux/wiki/Bugzilla-6-Roadmap

With support from the BZ team, Kohei Yoshino has essentially solved BZ 
UX (this includes drafting plans for the future) and I am immensely 
grateful to him.

The underlying functionality will remain superior to GitLabs and hubs as 
it has been for years.

Ilmari