Improving Bugzilla Status Names
djarvie at kde.org
Sun Sep 30 17:39:04 BST 2018
On 28 September 2018 09:48:42 BST, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
>Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
>> > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and
>> > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
>> > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
>> > INVALID -> NOTABUG
>> one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in
>> and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we
>> something different for Reopened then.
>If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the
>bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no
>discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
>I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going
I think that REPORTED is an ideal term for a newly opened bug. Is there really a problem with the abbreviations REPO and REOP? Surely people will quickly get used to making the distinction, if they make a mistake at all. In any case, as soon as the bug report is accessed, it will be clear what its status is. Please keep REPORTED and REOPENED as they are.
KAlarm author, KDE developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kde-community