Let's get rid of UNCONFIRMED/CONFIRMED
Nate Graham
nate at kde.org
Tue Apr 10 18:55:57 BST 2018
---- On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:50:19 -0700 Albert Astals Cid<aacid at kde.org> wrote ----
> El dimarts, 10 d’abril de 2018, a les 19:43:51 CEST, Nate Graham va escriure:
> > ---- On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:29:54 -0700 Albert Astals Cid<aacid at kde.org>
> > wrote ----
> > > Of course it makes sense for wishlists to be confirmed.
> > >
> > > OPEN -> Nobody's looked at it yet
> > > CONFIRMED -> Somebody looked at it and is a wish that makes sense.
> >
> > A "confirmed" status only makes sense as a contrast to "unconfirmed". For
> > bugs, we want that status because bugs that have been triaged and cannot be
> > reproduced yet may be reproducible by someone else at some point in the
> > future.
> >
> > But for wishes it's different: if a "confirmed" status for a wishlist bug
> > means "Somebody looked at it and it is a wish that makes sense", then the
> > corresponding opposite "unconfirmed" status would be "Somebody looked at it
> > and it is NOT a wish that makes sense." In this case, the correct course of
> > action is to close it as RESOLVED WONTFIX or INVALID; there is no need to
> > keep open a wishlist bug that the developers have no intention of
> > implementing.
>
> So how do you propose i differentiate with items i have looked at from the
> ones i have not looked at yet when doing a search in bugzilla if they are both
> marked as OPEN?
Ah I see what you mean now. Yes, that makes sense.
Nate
More information about the kde-community
mailing list