Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

[Eike Hein]

On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeiffer at kde.org> wrote:
>Here are the results of the survey:
>https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/
>Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile!
>Cheers,
>Thomas

Hi,

I propose we:

* Turn the must-have list into a wiki table and create columns for each chat solution
* In each cell, use
** ... a red background to indicate a feature is not available, and neither planned nor likely to happen
** ... a yellow background if a feature is either not yet widely available or still in the planning stages, with text (in the cell? footnote?) having to provide details including timeline of expect ed availability
** ... a green background if a feature is supported

I can take a stab at the Matrix and maybe IRC v3 columns (especially as the Konversation UI rewrite and planned Matrix support imho turns some additionals cells yellow, but even without Konvi-NG I think it's compelling personally).


Cheers,
Eike
-- 
Plasma, apps developer
KDE e.V. vice president, treasurer
Seoul, South Korea