phab reviews

[Adriaan de Groot]

On Saturday 26 August 2017 23:06:29 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Not from `arc` which is a wholly different problem I suppose. But yes,
> > it's kinda manageable, just not all that convenient. The tricky bit is
> > really figuring out who to set as reviewer to begin with.
> 
> Ideally you wouldn't need to set a reviewer at all - it should be
> handled for you automatically.

Would it make sense to add this information -- possibly just as a comment, but 
it'd be better as real data -- in the .arcconfig of each repo? That would 
require work from Phab upstream to do right, but it would be useful so that 
individual repo's can say

reviewers: [ tom, dick, harry ]

or whatever the right JSON formatting is for that.

[ade]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20170826/bc08aca3/attachment.sig>