Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

[Boudewijn Rempt]

Now in the right thread:

I actually think I missed two things that would be important to me:

* no logging: it should be possible to have no public logs of a channel
* per-channel nicks: to avoid people joining in getting renamed to GuestXXXX


On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a KDE-wide 
> > primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys:
> > 
> > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959
> > 
> > The Kano model [1] categorizes features not just in "must have" and "nice to 
> > have" but into five categories along two dimensions.
> > This results in a more holistic view on the requirements, at the expense of 
> > making the survey quite long because participants have to rate each feature on 
> > two dimensions.
> 
> Weird... I would say that "I expect" is much stronger than "I like".
> 
> > 
> > So, please fill in the survey, but be aware that overall you'll have to answer 
> > a whopping 106 questions (rating 53 requirements on two dimensions each), so 
> > please reserve enough time.
> > The survey took me 13 minutes to complete, but of course I've already read the 
> > requirements countless times, so you might need a bit more time.
> > 
> > Thank you in advance for your participation,
> > Thomas
> > 
> > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kano_model
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.krita.org, http://www.valdyas.org