Applications Lifecycle Policy

[Jonathan Riddell]

On 5 July 2017 at 13:04, Jaroslaw Staniek <staniek at kde.org> wrote:
> Why not? I can imagine we can make the process more dynamic.
> Whole apps or their parts can go back to being maintained, what seems to be
> a core property of FOSS.
>
> If so how about back-arrow from Unmaintained?

Probably not worth making the diagram more complex but I added in this
sentence to unmaintained section

"Projects can move back to an earlier stage if they are picked up for
maintenance again. "

Jonathan