Applications Lifecycle Policy

[Jaroslaw Staniek]

On 4 July 2017 at 13:20, Jonathan Riddell <jr at jriddell.org> wrote:

> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update
>
> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages?
>
> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft
>
> Jonathan
>

Hi
Looking good. One thing: is there life after "unmaintained"?

Why not? I can imagine we can make the process more dynamic.
Whole apps or their parts can go back to being maintained, what seems to be
a core property of FOSS.

If so how about back-arrow from ​Unmaintained?

-- 
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek

KDE:
: A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators
: and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org
Calligra Suite:
: A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org
Kexi:
: A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi
Qt Certified Specialist:
: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20170705/994dcf65/attachment.htm>