[kde-community] Licensing question with header-only libraries

[Adriaan de Groot]

On Sunday 24 January 2016 09:37:33 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> The issue is that (if I'm correct) LGPL does not have anything
> different to GPL in this case since this is not a library that is
> dynamically linked - if someone uses it, its code becomes a part of
> the end product.

This is something we'd typically ask the legal folks at the FSFE. I'll ask 
*anyway*, even if you've already made up your mind -- it'll give us a talking 
point this weekend at FOSDEM, too.

[ade]