[kde-community] Official KDE mirror on github

Kevin Krammer krammer at kde.org
Sat Sep 19 12:54:28 UTC 2015


On Saturday, 2015-09-19, 14:43:37, Bhushan Shah wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Sune Vuorela <nospam at vuorela.dk> wrote:
> > I personally feel a bit fucked over right now. All this started with a
> > KDE github mirror and *just a mirror*. No pull requests. No bugtracker.
> > No nothing else. Just a mirror. And it was repeatedly said in the thread
> > that it would be just a mirror. Just a mirror.
> 
> And when we say mirror and if we start to accept pull request there it
> will also complicate the sysadmin work if I know correctly
> 
> How would git.kde.org will stay up-to-date if you merged pull request
> on github? This is one of the reason currently sysadmin allows pushes
> on just git.kde.org and not on anongit.kde.org

I have to say I don't have any experience with pull requests, whatever those 
are, but since Jaroslaw put the into the context of patches by email I would 
assume that the workflow still has all patches go through proper review, these 
pull request would just be a form of patch submission.

Lets consider an example, say Okular.

If Okular has the policy that nothing is merged without review, then all 
patches for Okular need to go through KDE's review tool 
(reviewboard/gerrit/phabricator/whatever).

If contributors to Okular feel they want to accept submission per email, 
bugzilla attachment or github pull request, then they will still have to 
submit these patches for review, no?

Cheers,
Kevin
-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20150919/cab6dc22/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-community mailing list