[kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

[Kevin Ottens]

On Tuesday 12 November 2013 17:51:36 Eike Hein wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 November 2013 17:33:08 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > if that is not clear (and apparently it is not .. you aren’t the first to
> > suggest this) then perhaps we need a phrase other than “project assets” or
> > some clarification of it.
> 
> I was toying with 'deliverables', but it doesn't feel quite
> right either. Unless any of you feel that works?

I purposefully try to stay away from discussions to avoid introducing my own 
biases... But I'll make an exception for that one.

Maybe "project" is the wrong scope indeed, it seems you guys try to say it's 
the "product" which matters. So what about "product assets" instead?

My 0.02€

Cheers.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20131112/c148964a/attachment.sig>