[kde-community] Discussion: KDE Manifesto, "web services"

[Kevin Ottens]

On Monday 11 November 2013 10:44:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday, November 10, 2013 19:12:29 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > "Projects that do not use KDE infrastructure for their online services
> > must
> > work with the KDE sysadmin team on an agreement to ensure continuity."
> 
> Perhaps it could be stated in the positive:
> 
> * Online services associated with the project are either hosted on KDE
> infrastructure or have an action plan that ensures continuity which is
> approved by the KDE system administration team
> 
> it’s a bit longer than your nice, tight treatment, but it notes both
> possibilities (KDE infra or not) in the positive and implies that KDE
> infrastructure is desired. it also moves the “must work .. on an agreement”,
> which simply says they must be working on such a thing, to being a
> commitment as they “have an action plan"

Indeed I like that wording better[*]. A bit longer indeed but still OK 
compared to what we have right now.

Anybody disagrees with that proposal?

Cheers.

[*] Damn you! Native speakers!! ;-)
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20131111/30dca2fc/attachment.sig>