Review Request: Make kdepim-runtime configuration less verbose
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
aleixpol at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 00:26:18 UTC 2012
> On Aug. 20, 2012, 4:37 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package() calls there?
>
> Allen Winter wrote:
> Yes, I'm also curious about why these 2 are so much more irritating than any other find_packages()
>
> Aleix, can you paste the annoying parts? Maybe we can convince the libkolab folks to make their stuff less babbly.
Well, it's what happens when you look for a Config.cmake file that has to be installed.
Sorry for the delay, forgot about providing this :P.
CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:122 (find_package):
By not providing "FindLibkolab.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project has
asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by "Libkolab",
but CMake did not find one.
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Libkolab"
(requested version 0.2) with any of the following names:
LibkolabConfig.cmake
libkolab-config.cmake
Add the installation prefix of "Libkolab" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
"Libkolab_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If
"Libkolab" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has
been installed.
CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:125 (find_package):
By not providing "FindLibkolabxml.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project
has asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by
"Libkolabxml", but CMake did not find one.
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Libkolabxml" with
any of the following names:
LibkolabxmlConfig.cmake
libkolabxml-config.cmake
Add the installation prefix of "Libkolabxml" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
"Libkolabxml_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If
"Libkolabxml" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it
has been installed.
- Aleix
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review17759
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 20, 2012, 3:22 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 20, 2012, 3:22 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Build System and KDEPIM.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> in case the package is not required, don't print a ton of debug output but proceed quietly if it's not present.
>
> the fact that it's not found is already notified by the log anyway.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CMakeLists.txt d91ed8a
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20120904/eac16c36/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-buildsystem
mailing list