KDE/kdebase/runtime

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Sunday 04 October 2009, Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Sunday 04 October 2009 15:38:19 you wrote:
> > Em Domingo 4. Outubro 2009, às 15.10.05, Michael Jansen escreveu:
> > > GroundWork for FindKDE4Runtime.cmake. Copied and adapted from
> > > workspace.
> > >
> > > Needed for nepomuk-kde if kdelibs and kdebase/ are installed into
> > > different prefixes.
> > >
> > > Please comment. I will wait for an ok before changing nepomuk-kde.
> >
> > I don't think this makes sense.
> >
> > KDEBase-runtime is a runtime dependency. It should not be a build-time
> > dependency for anything.

That's right, but we also have a FindKDE4Workspace.cmake, since workspace 
installs several libraries.
Is that different from runtime ?

> > Please ensure that the application can compile without kdebase-runtime
> > installed.
>
> That depends on the definition of "can compile without kdebase-runtime
> installed".
>
> It needs the ontologies provided by kdebase/runtime/nepomuk/ontologies .
>
> So only kde4runtime_dbus_interfaces_dir and kde4runtime_data_dir are
> required for nepomuk-kde. It does not compile if it does not find them.
> Only sebastian can tell if it makes sense to compile it if some or all of
> them are missing. I'm currently just trying to make it compile under all
> circumstances.
>
> perhaps we should throw out some of the stuff from these files that have to
> do with providing include files and libraries and just keep the stuff that
> defines the runtime environment like the two vars above.
>
> While working on it i noticed i need to do the same for kdebase/apps later
> because nepomuk-kde compiles against konq_menu .
>
> Btw. i think the kde4_ vars are badly named. they should be named
> kdelibs_include_dir etc. , because that's all they stand for.

I also thought about this, and I think I agree that KDELIBS4_ would be a more 
correct prefix. 
But this has to stay that way at least for all of KDE 4.x.

Alex