KDE/kdelibs

[Thiago Macieira]

Sune Vuorela wrote:
>On Saturday 09 May 2009 12:48:47 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> > I don't think find_package(KDE4) should find anything but "real
>> > kdelibs", and as the experimental parts are packaged seperately, it
>> > neeeds two checks.
>>
>> Technically it's the same as when e.g. building plasma or khtml
>> separately, so I'd like to handle it the same way.
>> I.e. after find_package(KDE4) no additional
>> find_package(khtml) should be necessary, but instead either
>> if(KDE4_KHTML_FOUND) or if (KDE4_KHTML_LIBS) should be checked.
>> Since also experimental can be built as part of kdelibs, I would
>> prefer doing it the same way.
>
>I think you should treat it more like if it was a seperate module like
>kdepimlibs.

More than that. You have to treat "kdelibs experimental 4.3" as a module. 
Because "kdelibs experimental 4.4" is not enough to match.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20090509/d4ff0799/attachment.sig