[PATCH] Making Soprano optional (again) in kdelibs

[Maciej Mrozowski]

On Sunday 27 of December 2009 19:06:18 Allen Winter wrote:

> From a kdepim point-of-view, Nepomuk must be a hard dependency as
> Kontact will have big problems without it.
> 
> So either Nepomuk is a hard dependency for kdelibs or for kdepim.
> 
> Might as well keep it a hard dependency for kdelibs.

First things first - Ok to commit the following change making nepomuk 
mandatory (sic!) in kdepim (see attachment)?

Also what's desired kdelibs and kdepimlibs version for upcoming 4.4 version of 
kdepim (and kdepim-runtime which is as we know distributed separately as 
well)?
Currently it's a bit inconsistent (any kdelibs + 4.3.66 kdepimlibs or 4.2.87 
in case of kdepim-runtime) - should I set it all to 4.4? (let's say 4.3.85). I 
doubt you test it with multiple versions of mentioned packages so maybe 
depending on versions you actually use for development (so is 4.4) is more 
reasonable.
Also I would like to reorganize flow control in kdepim CMake files so that it 
does not force all dependencies on *all* kdepim apps, but only on those who 
actually need those dependencies (like it's the case in other better 
buildsystem-wise organized modules like kdebase/*, kdeutils etc). For instance 
requiring strigi or nepomuk when building knode is incorrect.

-- 
regards
MM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdepim-nepomuk.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6109 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20091228/74256260/attachment.diff