do we want to keep the out-of-source-only requirement ?
michael.pyne at kdemail.net
Tue Apr 25 23:29:16 CEST 2006
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:09, Jaison Lee wrote:
> Both of these things may occur less if we allow only out-of-source
> builds. AND we won't need to constantly worry about one or the other
Indeed, as much as I like arbritray restrictions on developers, I think we
should leave it as out-of-source required. More or less for all the reasons
*) Clean separation between source and compiled results.
*) Only one style of build should mean that it will always work.
kdesvn-build has a few subroutines to deal with forcing modules that don't
natively support srcdir != builddir to work. Now that Qt 4 supports this,
it's looking like I can remove that code once I remove KDE 3 support in the
- Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20060425/d6cfa3c5/attachment.pgp
More information about the Kde-buildsystem