KDE/kdelibs

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Sunday 09 April 2006 22:32, you wrote:
> On Saturday 08 April 2006 01:43, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > 3) handle as 4+5 and relink during installation ?
> > >
> > > No, please.
> >
> > Your email came to late, I just committed.
> >
> > > > Wouldn't take a lot of time since this are only very few apps.
> > >
> > > It's not the time that is the problem, it's the "sudo make install" ->
> > > wrong permissions, problem.
> >
> > In which way wrong permissions ?
>
> People who do
>    make ; su -c "make install"
> end up with the relinked binary owned by root, which leads to problems
> later on when doing "make". 

I don't think so. The relinked libs/executables are located in a special 
directory, so they don't interfere with the normal compile results.
Only when deleting the build tree you have to be root then.

> Doing linking operations during "make install" is just wrong IMHO.

> > Is it good enough that where this is problematic should just
> > build without RPATH at all ?
>
> Yes, since we have the wrapper shell script for calling those binaries
> anyway, no? Does .kcfg compilation in kdelibs happen by calling
> kcfg_compiler.sh automatically?

Yes.

> > So it seems we don't need
> > kde4_add_executable( target [ NOGUI | RUN_UNINSTALLED] ...)
> > but
> > kde4_add_executable( target [NOGUI] [RUN_UNINSTALLED] ...)
> > Right ?
>
> Do you mean being able to set both NOGUI and RUN_UNINSTALLED?

More RUN_UNINSTALLED but create a OS X bundle, which is currently not 
implemented.

> Hmm... I can't see the relation with the above, but certainly this seems
> useful for unit-test programs, and for e.g. kcfg_compiler.
>
> GUI+RUN_UNINSTALLED would be what interactive test programs
> (e.g. kdeui/tests/kwindowtest) would use.

Yes.

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net