PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration
Shaheed Haque
srhaque at theiet.org
Sat Jan 28 20:14:34 UTC 2017
Just to close this thread...in the review I just posted, I renamed the
stuff like this:
decl2 -> cxx_decl
fn_result2 -> cxx_fn_result
On 21 January 2017 at 12:34, Shaheed Haque <srhaque at theiet.org> wrote:
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> As for the second declaration etc, the SIP specification at
> http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html refers to
> it as the "*c++-signature*", so I'll look into replacing the number with
> a suffix like "_cpp".
>
> Thanks, Shaheed
>
> On 21 January 2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Steve,
>> >
>> > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the
>> > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here:
>>
>> > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also
>> be
>> > an array:
>>
>> That makes sense to me.
>>
>> I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate
>> names which convey what the second set of values are for?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20170128/2352153b/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-bindings
mailing list