PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration

Shaheed Haque srhaque at theiet.org
Sat Jan 21 12:34:59 UTC 2017


Thanks for confirming.

As for the second declaration etc, the SIP specification at
http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html refers to it
as the "*c++-signature*", so I'll look into replacing the number with a
suffix like "_cpp".

Thanks, Shaheed

On 21 January 2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:

> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the
> > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here:
>
> > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also
> be
> > an array:
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate
> names which convey what the second set of values are for?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20170121/a3d11a2d/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-bindings mailing list