End of 2016 update on PyKF5 bindings

[Shaheed Haque]

Hi Steve,

On 18 January 2017 at 23:38, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18 January 2017 at 21:44, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>>>
>>>> HI Steve,
>>>>
>>>> I closed two of the reviews based on testing KDE/master. That leaves
>>>> only https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129763/: this should be
>>>> non-controversial as it removes a functional no-op which just gets ion
>>>> the way of my stuff, so please take a look at it when you can.
>>>
>>> This doesn't look like a no-op to me. I'm also generally not in favor of
>>> adding things to ECM which do not directly help the goal of getting
>>> bindings into frameworks repos.
>>
>> If you look at how the CMake constructs ${hdr_filename} and
>> ${hdr_file}, you'll see that they are redundant.
>
> Hi Shaheed,
>
> It is not uncommon in kde repos (eg kcoreaddons) to specify files in
> subdirectories, yet expect that the filename without subdirectory is what is
> used in the #include. I think that's what you're seeing as 'redundancy'.
> I've extended the ECM test for this case. I don't know if your patch affects
> it.

I see (I handle that differently!) so I'll look for another way. Leave
this with me for now.

>> I plan to do the rebasing in two phases, mostly to cleanly separate
>> the bulk stuff from your view. I'm making decent progress on the first
>> phase. So far a couple things have come up, and I will discuss them
>> with you in a separate thread so we can explore the way forward as
>> they come up.
>
> Great. I hope the issues can be discussed in terms of adding more/better
> bindings to repos.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve.