[Kde-bindings] KDE 4.2 RC1 (4.1.96) try#1

[Sune Vuorela]

On Sunday 11 January 2009 23:56:56 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> They
> indeed currently consider, that one would configure/build kdebindings
> twice, a first time to compile the "base" stuff (qt+kdelibs bindings), then
> a second time to compile the "appplications" stuff (plasma, okular,
> whatever). But they are open to other solutions, and they trully want
> bindings to be easy for packagers, but they don't know what to do for this.

This definately won't happen, unless the bindings get split in the source 
level, so that building becomes base > bindings-base > apps > bindings-apps.

But this would require stuff like libsmoke to actually grow some kind of abi 
stability.

The current issue in workspace vs bindings is mostly a runtime vs buildtime 
issue though.
workspace needs bindings at runtime, but actually not at build time. CMake 
checks at build time.

Patch:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-kde/branches/kde4.2/packages/kdebase-
workspace/debian/patches/23_do_not_depend_on_bindings.diff?rev=13106&view=markup

> In other words, I think their is a huge lack of communication, between the
> bindings people, and packagers, so I want to invite packagers to express
> how they want things to be on kde-bindings at kde.org.

Done.

/Sune

-- 
Do you know how to debug the window?

First you need to turn off the code to a 82-bit POP3 GPU over the software for 
reinstalling on the head.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20090112/3a44f5e0/attachment.sig>