[Kde-bindings] Qyoto/Kimono WebKit C# component

[Richard Dale]

On Friday 13 February 2009 11:26:15 SE1 wrote:
> Richard Dale-5 wrote:
> > Hi Richard
> >
> > On Monday 09 February 2009 23:02:35 you wrote:
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> We are looking for someone to help us integrate a WebKit browser into
> >> our Microsoft Surface application.  From what I can tell you worked on
> >> the Qyoto/Komono bridge and so you might be aware of someone who can
> >> help us make the Qt WebKit accessible to a C#/WPF application on
> >> Microsoft Surface.  Any pointers you can provide would be much
> >> appreciated!
> >
> > That certainly sounds an interesting project and I'm sure that Arno (the
> > project co-developer) and myself would be happy to help out. The Qyoto
> > bindings include the Qt WebKit classes and they normally run under Mono.
> > However, someone has posted patches to the kde bindings mailing list to
> > get it
> > to work with the Microsoft CLR on Windows, and I don't believe it should
> > be a
> > great problem in getting the WebKit component to work.
> >
> > I've cc'd this mail to the kde bindings mailing list so that other people
> > can
> > reply if they've tried Qyoto and Qt Webkit on Windows already.
> >
> > regards
> > -- Richard Dale
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kde-bindings mailing list
> > Kde-bindings at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
>
> Hello,
>
> that someone would be me. You're right, it's not a big deal getting WebKit
> to work. In fact I just noticed that the package I made for Windows a while
> ago, also contains QtWebKit. Can't remember if I've tried it though, so
> I've made some small adjustments to my little test app and at first sight
> it seems to work just fine (see image). For pointers on how to build on
> windows and to get the binaries I compiled, see
> http://imaginary-project.net/wiki/qyoto .
I think we should try and get some of your fixes for Windows added to Qyoto. 
When you posted the patch I think we were a bit busy to do anything then, but 
now KDE 4.3 isn't for a while it should be a good time to get it done.

>
> ps. Don't know if this will be send to the original author, as I'm
> following the list though the archive and that seems to filter mail
> addresses.
They're not subscribed to this list and I haven't heard anything more yet.

> http://www.nabble.com/file/p21994606/qtwindows-example.png
That looks pretty good, and I think that QWebKit support is supposed to be a 
lot better in Qt 4.5

-- Richard