[Kde-bindings] Replacing kalyptus

[Arno Rehn]

Am Mittwoch 03 Oktober 2007 18:57:06 schrieb Paolo Capriotti:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18:47:58 Arno Rehn wrote:
> > > I don't think the moc parser is good enough, and we should use one of
> > > Roberto Raggi's full blown C++ parsers like the KDevelop one, or
> > > another one that the QtJambi bindings use.
> >
> > Why a full blown parser? The only thing we need is something that gathers
> > all the namespaces, classes and methods with return type and parameter
> > types (and if it's a signal/slot). I think moc provides all that stuff.
>
> You would probably have troubles with template classes. AFAIK, moc doesn't
> handle templates, but bindings do need them.
Neither does gccxml, and kalyptus, too, IIRC (at least there are no template 
classes in smoke)

-- 
Arno Rehn
arno at arnorehn.de