[Kde-bindings] Replacing kalyptus

[Paolo Capriotti]

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18:47:58 Arno Rehn wrote:
> > I don't think the moc parser is good enough, and we should use one of
> > Roberto Raggi's full blown C++ parsers like the KDevelop one, or another
> > one that the QtJambi bindings use.
>
> Why a full blown parser? The only thing we need is something that gathers
> all the namespaces, classes and methods with return type and parameter
> types (and if it's a signal/slot). I think moc provides all that stuff.

You would probably have troubles with template classes. AFAIK, moc doesn't 
handle templates, but bindings do need them.

Paolo Capriotti