[Kde-bindings] license question
mathpup at mylinuxisp.com
Wed Dec 21 04:46:32 UTC 2005
> If you must purchase a commercial license to BOTH Qt AND whatever bindings
> you're using to do a commercial Qt app in anything but C++, then how can
> they claim that the bindings are competing with them? I've never heard of
> any bindings claiming to be a replacement for Qt, nor could they be. You
> purchase just Qt or both, meaning no matter what they get their cut.
It has been a long time since I had the conversation, so the details are
coming back slowly (but faster than my dead hard drive with the email
archives is coming back).
As I am recalling now, the catch is that anyone who wanted to use the bindings
in a commercial way would also need the commercial Qt license. In this way,
they are differentiating bindings from "normal" applications. For example, if
I wrote my application SuperDuper, I would normally be include Qt's libs in
the application if I had a commercial Qt license, but for bindings, they
would not permit that kind of situation.
(I say "commercial" in the generic sense for proprietary, enterprise license
or whatever the phrasing is.)
More information about the Kde-bindings