[Kde-bindings] Using a custom RealProxy to implement a C# SMOKE adaptor

[Richard Dale]

On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:58, Marcus wrote:
> Suffice to say that Qt# will not be using Smoke. If you wish to produce a
> competitor to Qt# for the CLI, that is your choice.
Well, I've personally got no intention to compete with anyone - the whole 
point of the KDE project is to encourage cooperation. There are plenty of 
other languages which need bindings that I can work on. 

I just thought RealProxies looked a neat feature to use as an alternative to 
delegates, that's all.

-- Richard

> On Friday 22 August 2003 5:32 am, Richard Dale wrote:
> > On Friday 22 August 2003 03:24, Marcus wrote:
> > > I believe that C# has superior mechanisms for interoperating with C and
> > > C++ than does Java. RealProxy was designed for remoting, and there is
> > > going to be a substantial amount of overhead in any kind of remoting
> > > activity.