pros and cons
Gary Kline
kline at thought.org
Sun Oct 14 06:29:01 BST 2018
=====
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With Thirty+ years of service to the Unix community.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:37:20AM -0500, Daniel Crone wrote:
> Though I have never used k d e and have no idea what it is like, here is my reason I hope accessibility for this desktop gets where it should be.
> It is a good idea to have several accessible desktop choices around incase one is no longer workable one day.
> Gnome’s settings are hard to work for me.
> But to choose a wireless network is not easy in mate.
> Each desktop has its own good points.
> From anyone who has used k d e, what are its ways it is your desktop of choice?
>
no pity, no "I'm So sorry". but it's harder for me to see. so
it's (blah, blah, blah) etc. I used to use kde because my
volunteer system admin liked it best. the gnome icons and using
a script with
echo and some accessibility setup help me to having the computer
read to me. ---i deserve a Swift kick for losing the script.
but that the cost of doing too many things that once.
I'll call it a century there.
1. Gnome
2. kde
3. patching C and othrt scripts together.
---sorry I couldn't be of more help
--
Gary Kline kline at thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Thirty+ years of service to the Unix community.
More information about the kde-accessibility
mailing list