[Kde-accessibility] AT-SPI, to ATK or not to ATK...

[Olaf Jan Schmidt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[Peter Korn]
> If the point of this work is to make an accessible KDE desktop, wouldn'=
t
> you want an accessible, full featured web browser as part of it?

Creating a full solution with software for all kinds of possible=20
accessibility needs is a task which is even bigger then making KDE=20
applications accessible.

But even if we headed for this big aim, then we would probably rather try=
=20
to make Konquerer accessible as well.

> If you plan to package *any* of those three applications with your
> accessible KDE desktop, then you are going to have to package a number
> of GNOME librarie anyway.

We do not aim to package any complete solutions; at the moment we would=20
already be very happy if KDE applications cooperated well with existing=20
GNOME solutions via AT-SPI.

Olaf.

- --=20
Olaf Jan Schmidt, KDE Accessibility team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj3kC48ACgkQoLYC8AehV8dBSgCgoBHy5P1dCfqI4UEcPMusKAXK
ZSMAnjeAEauMaDdDr5jgfb4wQvjVVEPY
=3DAfKv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----