My pitch on KDE16

[Jos Poortvliet]

On Wednesday 29 December 2010 14:56:23 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 December 2010 14:52:40 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > I obviously like it. This would need the creation of such an
> > infrastructure  for easier and better feature tracking and the two
> > branches. It wouldn't be easy, but it is a possible and potentially
> > promising way forward...
> 
> Certainly promising. There is only a thing that worries me a bit:
> 
> - will some of us (us:=KDE), who by definition like to experiment and be on
> the bleeding edge, accept the compromise to stay on an old and boring
> version just to do maintainance, without even being paid?

Yes, the implementation can be hard. But there might be solutions there - we 
can allow building & installing of both normal and bleeding edge at the same 
time; maybe the distro's can pitch in; and I bet there are at least SOME ppl 
who would be interested in this, esp if we advertise it properly (not as 
boring but a stable & usable)

> food for thought, anyways, I really like this.
> 
> Bye,
> -Riccardo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/k16/attachments/20101229/3910ecac/attachment.sig