My pitch on KDE16

Riccardo Iaconelli riccardo at kde.org
Wed Dec 29 14:56:23 CET 2010


On Tuesday 28 December 2010 14:52:40 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> I obviously like it. This would need the creation of such an
> infrastructure  for easier and better feature tracking and the two
> branches. It wouldn't be easy, but it is a possible and potentially
> promising way forward...

Certainly promising. There is only a thing that worries me a bit:

- will some of us (us:=KDE), who by definition like to experiment and be on 
the bleeding edge, accept the compromise to stay on an old and boring version 
just to do maintainance, without even being paid?

food for thought, anyways, I really like this.

Bye,
-Riccardo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/k16/attachments/20101229/e01c9d53/attachment.sig 


More information about the K16 mailing list