Review Request 121140: Make Baloo detection and usage more subtle
Vishesh Handa
me at vhanda.in
Thu Nov 20 10:22:17 UTC 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/#review70684
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Vishesh Handa
On Nov. 17, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 2:59 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Gwenview, David Edmundson, Lukáš Tinkl, and Vishesh Handa.
>
>
> Repository: gwenview
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> at the moment we have slightly messy situation.
> there is baloo/5.1, and baloo master. we know gwenview will not build with < 5.1.90, that is master.
> also resolved the old problem when user would select baloo backend, but it wasn't found, thus the build would fail in the middle.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CMakeLists.txt 928cbb1
> lib/CMakeLists.txt ec64b24
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> inspected config-gwenview.h after passing various options (and locally raising required baloo version to 5.1.91)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hrvoje Senjan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gwenview-devel/attachments/20141120/da9dcf50/attachment.html>
More information about the Gwenview-devel
mailing list