Review Request 121140: Make Baloo detection and usage more subtle

Vishesh Handa me at vhanda.in
Thu Nov 20 10:22:17 UTC 2014


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/#review70684
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks good to me.

- Vishesh Handa


On Nov. 17, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 2:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Gwenview, David Edmundson, Lukáš Tinkl, and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Repository: gwenview
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> at the moment we have slightly messy situation.
> there is baloo/5.1, and baloo master. we know gwenview will not build with < 5.1.90, that is master.
> also resolved the old problem when user would select baloo backend, but it wasn't found, thus the build would fail in the middle.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 928cbb1 
>   lib/CMakeLists.txt ec64b24 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121140/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> inspected config-gwenview.h after passing various options (and locally raising required baloo version to 5.1.91)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gwenview-devel/attachments/20141120/da9dcf50/attachment.html>


More information about the Gwenview-devel mailing list