pre-boarding call

[Samuel Gaist]

On 18 août 2014, at 20:44, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday 18 August 2014, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> Possible cons:
>> 
>> * could become git-level scary if the user interface is not carefully
>> considered
> 
> one key here is enough of saying no to new features/command switches that are 
> not completely, absolutely needed…
> 
+1
However, would a hook or plugin architecture be something to consider for people wanting to extend the command ?

> 
>> Do you prefer "one tool to rule them all" or "a suite of separately named
>> tools, one per task"?
> 
> would go for one to rule them all with syntax like
> funq command subcommand [options]
> 
+1, it will also simply deployment of the sdk

Resent to the list, excuse me Marco.