[FreeNX-kNX] fyi why I am using nxagent and not nxproxy
Roberto A. Foglietta
roberto.foglietta at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 06:32:28 UTC 2009
2009/6/22, Mario Becroft <mb at gem.win.co.nz>:
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 2009/6/22, Misha Koshelev <mk144210 at bcm.edu>:
> >> nxproxy by itself does not seem to get better compressing than tight VNC.
> >>
> >
> > http://www.nomachine.com/documents/building-components.php
> >
> > As we have seen, good compression would be useless without a
> > comparable effort dedicated to reducing the X round-trips. Single
> > applications run through an nxproxy tunnel cannot currently leverage
> > round-trip suppression offered by nxagent. A rootless nxagent (that is
> > a nxagent that is able to mix its own windows with windows opened by
> > local clients on the real X server) will be made available in the
> > future.
>
>
> Actually this mode is already available. It does seem to have some
> peculiarities though compared with running applications in the normal
> way.
>
What do you mean for 'normal' way?
--
Roberto A. Foglietta,
Linux Embedded Consultant
mobile: (+39) 349.33.30.697
More information about the FreeNX-kNX
mailing list