[FreeNX-kNX] fyi why I am using nxagent and not nxproxy

Roberto A. Foglietta roberto.foglietta at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 06:32:28 UTC 2009


2009/6/22, Mario Becroft <mb at gem.win.co.nz>:
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta at gmail.com> writes:
>
>  > 2009/6/22, Misha Koshelev <mk144210 at bcm.edu>:
>  >> nxproxy by itself does not seem to get better compressing than tight VNC.
>  >>
>  >
>  > http://www.nomachine.com/documents/building-components.php
>  >
>  > As we have seen, good compression would be useless without a
>  > comparable effort dedicated to reducing the X round-trips. Single
>  > applications run through an nxproxy tunnel cannot currently leverage
>  > round-trip suppression offered by nxagent. A rootless nxagent (that is
>  > a nxagent that is able to mix its own windows with windows opened by
>  > local clients on the real X server) will be made available in the
>  > future.
>
>
> Actually this mode is already available. It does seem to have some
>  peculiarities though compared with running applications in the normal
>  way.
>

 What do you mean for 'normal' way?


-- 
Roberto A. Foglietta,
Linux Embedded Consultant
mobile: (+39) 349.33.30.697



More information about the FreeNX-kNX mailing list