[FreeNX-kNX] freenx vs. nomachine server performance
Tom Lobato
tomlobato at gmail.com
Sun Jun 3 14:38:52 UTC 2007
I tried the settings below and it helped to improve the performance:
- disable ssl
- cache in memory: 32MB
- cache on disk: 128MB
- compression: Modem
But with the same settings, nomachine run faster. Is it implementation
intrinsic or may freenx be tunned even more to perform equal?
Tom Lobato
2007/6/2, Tom Lobato <tomlobato at gmail.com>:
>
>
> I read the linuxjournal serie about NX and tried Nomachine and
> FreeNX servers, with nomachine client. I noted a big difference between
> it. Nomachine was faster on my tests.
>
> The server has a 2 Mbit/sec download and upload link. My client (in
> home) is on ADSL 1Mbit/sec down and 128Kbit/sec up. RTT between client
> and server is 50ms.
>
> Is such difference ever time present?
> Is there some tunning for reach nomachine performance or almost?
> If FreeNX is based on the same core libraries as Nomachine, why such
> difference?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Tom Lobato
>
More information about the FreeNX-kNX
mailing list