[FreeNX-kNX] Understanding FreeNX - Second Chance

Jose Manuel Vigil jose at vigil.com.ar
Wed Jul 25 23:02:13 UTC 2007


Pardon me guys I haven't read Nomachine documentation thats why I asked such
basic questions. Apologize.
Thanks indeed.
Jose



Jose Manuel Vigil wrote:
> 
> Fabian and Kurt,
> First of all congratulations and thanks for developing an open source
> solution for the NX protocol to all the community. Its an opportunity for
> all of us to learn about this technology and thats why I am here to
> understand in a deeper way.
> 
> I have a couple of questions I would like to ask regarding this flowcharts
> Kurt has posted here. Specially the NX proxies and nxagent-agent
> accelerate X protocol transfers.
> http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=NX_Components
> 
> Background of the question:
> In the flowchart of the above link you place on the right side the remote
> X applicat. or compl.KDE/GNOME session and next the nxagent next to it as
> the first link of NX compression system.
> I imagine that the remote X server has no idea that its protocol is being
> compressed cause FreeNX (agent or proxy) are in charge of talking the same
> X language so the remote X is being cheated in a way. Please don't
> missundertand me when I talk about cheating I only mean it in terms of
> communication and by no mean regarding your work and attitude.
> 
> After saying this have these questions:
> 
> 1) How does the FreeNX grabs the X11 protocol?
> 2) In which point of the communication -linux side- and sources files
> -FreeNX side- are the packages being kept for own NX compression purpose?
> 3) How does FreeNX cheats the remote X?
> 
> I really appreciate your help and collaboration.
> Thanks very much
> Jose.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Understanding-FreeNX---Second-Chance-tf4096645.html#a11801497
Sent from the freenx-knx mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




More information about the FreeNX-kNX mailing list