[FreeNX-kNX] Minimum bandwidth req's

Igor Manassypov imanassypov at cicore.com
Fri Feb 23 14:00:28 UTC 2007


In my tests I have no audio, and I was trying to scroll a pdf document.
The test line is roughly 400 kbps upstream, and the session was really
slow. I wonder if there are any settings you can tune?

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:00 +0100, freenx-knx-request at kde.org wrote:
> Send FreeNX-kNX mailing list submissions to
> 	freenx-knx at kde.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	freenx-knx-request at kde.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	freenx-knx-owner at kde.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of FreeNX-kNX digest..."
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
>          Don't forget to check the NX Knowledge Base:
>                  http://www.nomachine.com/kb/
>        Please also check the FreeNX Wiki+FAQ for hints. 
>   http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
> ________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Minimum bandwidth req's (Jo-Erlend Schinstad)
>    2. Re: Memory leak in nxagent, with patch (Dimitar Paskov)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:39:42 +0100
> From: "Jo-Erlend Schinstad" <joerlend.schinstad at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [FreeNX-kNX] Minimum bandwidth req's
> To: "User Support for FreeNX Server and kNX Client"
> 	<freenx-knx at kde.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<bc66a2e50702220939j64efaa63j8283365012848a2f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> On 22/02/07, Igor Manassypov <imanassypov at cicore.com> wrote:
> > >From your experience, what are the minimum bandwidth requirements for
> > near-realtime response from nxserver? I cant figure that part out, I
> > need to calculate how many concurrent clients can a particular line
> > sustain.
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > -igor
> 
> Wow, that was one large post. Well, a friend of mine told me he was
> using nx via gprs, which is about 30kbps, I think. It's abit difficult
> to answer your question, other than the standard "it depends". Because
> it does, depend on what you'll be using nx for. Nx uses advanced
> caching and compression techniques, which makes nx really fast. Do you
> use audio? One way, or both ways? That requires bandwidth. Do you only
> use applications with more or less static appearance? That won't
> require alot of bandwidth, because it's cached on the client. I've
> used tree concurrent connections on a 384kbps upstream line, and that
> went very well. That was without audio. I could probably have added at
> least two clients without problems. If I were you, I'd monitor the
> clients bandwidth usage while connected to the server. Do the things
> your users will be doing and see for yourself. Divide your available
> bandwidth by the peak bandwidth usage from the test, and you'll have
> the smallest number of clients you can have.
> 
> Good luck :)
> Jo-Erlend
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:11:41 +0200
> From: Dimitar Paskov <pascoff at nola7.com>
> Subject: Re: [FreeNX-kNX] Memory leak in nxagent, with patch
> To: User Support for FreeNX Server and kNX Client <freenx-knx at kde.org>
> Message-ID: <200702231111.41668.pascoff at nola7.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I forgot to mention, I use nxclient 1.5.0-141, nxagent Version 1.5.0 and 
> freenx 0.5 ... I haven't tried with different versions of the client and the 
> server and I didn't try the patch yet ... What is the meaning of 
> this "backing store" option, what does it change and how it affects the 
> problem with memory leak?
> 
> > > Yes, you are right, when I close the session (or kill nxagent which is
> > > the same) and open a new one everything is ok ... the problem is that I
> > > don't want to close the session every time the memory of the client is
> > > full ... I
> > > just want to kill the application which "fills" the memory or better just
> > > flush the cache and continue to work ...
> >
> > Well did it occur also with older version like 1.4.0?
> >
> > Have you tried the memleak patch and see if it fixes the problem.
> >
> > Have you tried to disable the backing store of your local Xserver?
> >
> > cu
> >
> > Fabian
> > ________________________________________________________________
> >      Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
> >     Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX Wiki/FAQ:
> >   http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
> >          Don't forget to check the NX Knowledge Base:
> >                  http://www.nomachine.com/kb/
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> >        FreeNX-kNX mailing list --- FreeNX-kNX at kde.org
> >       https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
> > ________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
>      Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
>     Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX Wiki/FAQ:
>   http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
> ________________________________________________________________
>        FreeNX-kNX mailing list --- FreeNX-kNX at kde.org
>       https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
> ________________________________________________________________
> 
> End of FreeNX-kNX Digest, Vol 30, Issue 26
> ******************************************




More information about the FreeNX-kNX mailing list