[FreeNX-kNX] nxlibs 1.5.0 and FreeNX 0.4.x
Kurt Pfeifle
k1pfeifle at gmx.net
Wed Jul 13 01:58:38 UTC 2005
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 01:47, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
> Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> > What is not so easy is to merge the big tarballs (or their diffs) back
> > into SVN when there were lots of changes in the meanwhile.
>
> I don't think it's really difficult. Just let the SVN/CVS tools do that
> for you.
These tools are not designed to convert tarballs into SVN repository
commits ;-)
There will be some manual work involved.
> Anyway you surely will be able to provide the necessary admin-
> istration overhead by volunteer helpers :-P.
Heh.
> > But we'll try. So we'll do it....
> >
> > What would be great is if you could give us access to intermediate
> > (non-released) tarballs too, which you may or may not use inside
> > NoMachine.
>
> The reason why we release snapshots, and not day by day development, is
> that we want to run a bit of QA before spreading a new release. We have
> 6/7 releases per day and testing requires time.
OK.
[
I do not need to tell you that...
a) the QA could be helped with (no guarantee, though) by having
a few more people use it
b) and that no-one would ever announce the intermediate development
versions gotten from, but not "released" by NoMachine as versions
which are fit for end user consumption or testing.
]
But you are already scaring me with the "6-7 releases per day" ;-)
I for sure would not be able to set aside voluntary time to merge each
and every of these releases back into a SVN repository... ;-)
So let's see how the work goes with the 1.5.0 snapshots (we *should* be
able to recover those from members of this list who have fetched +
"missed to delete" them.
We can re-consider the matter in a while, should we deem it important
or beneficial for either party.
> /Gian Filippo.
Cheers,
Kurt
More information about the FreeNX-kNX
mailing list