Licensing

[Nate Graham]

I'm fine with it.

Nate


On 2020-02-16 04:31, Alexander Stippich wrote:
> On Sonntag, 16. Februar 2020 10:40:46 CET Matthieu Gallien wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After the recent release of Elisa on the Microsoft store, it appears that
>> there might be some uncertainties about the compatibility between
>> LGPLv3/GPLv3 and the store.
>>
>> I would like to get opinion about a possible change of license like this:
>>
>> * c++ code would be licensed something like LGPLv2+ (maybe as approved by
>> the KDE e.V. membership)
>>
>> * qml code would be licensed something like GPLv2+ (maybe as approved by the
>> KDE e.V. membership)
>>
>> What do you think ?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> --
>> Matthieu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elisa mailing list
>> Elisa at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/elisa
> 
> Hello,
> 
> personally I don't mind a license change. I always wondered why the UI code is
> licensed with LGPL.
> It will probably not be that easy to reach all the contributors, though.
> I think the MPRIS code was taken from an existing implementation, which may
> make it hard to relicense it.
> 
> Is the issue really LGPL3/GPL3? If it is, I am surprised since Qt is also
> released under LGPL3 as far as I know.
> 
> Best regards,
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elisa mailing list
> Elisa at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/elisa
>