Change from old colors label (full box) to new labels (underline only)

[Ian McCarthy]

It is a shame that the original request was not implemented, of an 
option on the intensity of the label colour.
I too liked the original solution, far better that the new one, which I 
find makes it harder for me to pick and sort with. I would have prefer 
it if the intensity had been an option, as originally requested.
However we are picking in the fringes here, and there are probably far 
more important things to do.
-- 
Please keep up the good work,
Cheers Ian Mac

On 12/05/2025 04:40, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This change have been done in 8.5.0 following this entry in bugzilla :
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448045
>
> There is no option to revert to the old behavior.
>
> Best regards
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> Le jeu. 8 mai 2025 à 01:23, <digikam at sritch.com> a écrit :
>> On Wed, 7 May 2025 18:59:33 -0400
>> Sheridan Price <sheridanmp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The change from putting a complete box of color around a photo that
>>> was colour labeled to a simple splash line below the picture has
>>> however not been one of the upgrades/ changes that I was impressed
>>> by. I've really given it a try here as you can tell by the time lag
>>> between implementation and this email.
>>> Yep it looks very snazzy up close but I find when the page is full
>>> of photos the little bit of color doesn't stand out and for
>>> portrait photos even less. This makes it hard to scan folders to
>>> find labeled ones - yes I could use the search functions but that
>>> would be extra unnnecessary steps in some use cases.
>>> Is there any chance of getting it so the user has the choice of old
>>> or new styles?
>> 1. I agree with you. I would prefer the old way with the coloured box
>> around the image. It's much easier for me to spot them.
>>
>> 2. On the other hand, I did store a search with:
>>
>> picture properties > labels > clicked on: all colours except for the
>> none.
>>
>> This shows me the images labeled with colour per folder, but this
>> means an extra step.
>>
>> If there's a better way, I'd love to know.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Sher
>>
>> --
>> sknahT
>>
>> vyS