Digikam-users Digest, Vol 229, Issue 6

[Remco Viëtor]

On lundi 17 juin 2024 17:10:14 CEST Gregg Zupcsics wrote:
> Thanks for the reply,
> 
> I get it (I beleive) - metadata & fields in .xml files is a bit of a
> complicated and non-standardized mess, which makes supporting additional
> fields more complicated for sure.
> 
> Not with standing, I hope that the development & support team will
> consider supporting 1) Providing ability to view & edit more metada
> fields, including those included in some of the more common .xml file
> namespaces - including multiple instances of Album fields 2) Enable use of
> the metadata editor separate from, and without, creating a
> catalog/database.
> 
For that, the best way is to open a feature request on the Digikam bug tracker 
(a link to it is on the digikam site).

As an aside, please remove all the non-relevant text from the original message 
from your replies. Sending 30k of rubbish to everyone on the list isn't nice..