[digiKam-users] missing versions in version tree

[frederic chaume]

Hi Maik

thanks for your feedback
can you share the options you used with exiv2 to get the error message?
I used  exiv2 -p x for both and the result is showing a namespace 
Xmp.plus_1_.ImageCreator for the second one (with the complete version 
tree)  and Xmp.plus_1__1_.ImageCreator for the 1st one (with incomplete 
version tree)

also any guideline on how to rebuild the XMP with exiv2 ?

regards
frederic


Le 04/03/2023 à 18:05, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
>
> Unfortunately, there will be no fix for digiKam-7.10.0, the one image produces
> an XMP toolkit error:
>
> Exiv2 ( 3 ) :  XMP toolkit error 102: Unknown namespace prefix for qualified
> name
>
> Furthermore, the images contain an unknown XMP namespace "plus_1__1_" for
> Exiv2. In such a serious error in the XMP structure, when a warning or error
> occurs in Exiv2 in digiKam-8.0.0, the metadata is automatically read with
> ExifTool.
> You need to rebuild the XMP metadata of the images in question with ExifTool.
>
> Maik
>
> Am Samstag, 4. März 2023, 09:44:38 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>> thanks Maik
>> waiting for your feedback and eager to get the future 8.0 😁
>>
>> Good week-end
>>
>> Frederic
>>
>> Le 04/03/2023 à 07:43, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
>>> Hi Frederic,
>>>
>>> I'll continue the list here so as not to break the thread.
>>> Thanks for the sample images. Yes, I can reproduce the problem with
>>> digiKam-7.9.0 but not with digiKam-8.0.0.
>>> Well, there have already been some changes in BQM, to digiKam-8.0.0. I'll
>>> see at the weekend whether I can create a fix for digiKam-7.10.0 or
>>> whether the problem is deeper.
>>>
>>> Maik
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2023, 22:32:09 CET schrieben Sie:
>>>> I can't reproduce any problem at the moment. I have edited several images
>>>> in BQM and always have a history.
>>>>
>>>> Maik
>>>>
>>>> Am Mittwoch, 1. März 2023, 13:03:20 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>>>>> Hi Maik
>>>>>
>>>>> any feedback ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Frederic
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 27/02/2023 à 13:32, frederic chaume a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi Maik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the tag "Save Image as a newly created branch" is already set and the
>>>>>> same batch has been used for the 2 files
>>>>>> but for one , the generated file is missing in the version tree
>>>>>> Regrdas
>>>>>> Frederic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 27/02/2023 à 12:33, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
>>>>>>> In the BQM under the Behavior tab you can specify whether a new
>>>>>>> version with
>>>>>>> history is created or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am Montag, 27. Februar 2023, 11:07:47 CET schrieb frederic chaume:
>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the problem I have this morning:
>>>>>>>> I have 2 JPG in the same album. I put them in the same batch Queue.
>>>>>>>> As a
>>>>>>>> result I was expecting the see the different original and generated
>>>>>>>> versions in the version tree from the  right sidebar as usual.
>>>>>>>> That's  the case for one of the 2 files, but not for the other one
>>>>>>>> (but
>>>>>>>> the generated file is availble). I don't understand why, I tried
>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>> Is there any reason that would hide the generated file in the
>>>>>>>> version tree ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also as a consequence, is there a way to recreate or unhide the
>>>>>>>> versionining without generating the file again ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frederic
>
>
>