[digiKam-users] Updating raw file dates

Alan H webaccounts at live.com
Sun Oct 16 15:58:02 BST 2022


Maik - Thanks for that clarification and link about rewriting all the metadata. Being an infrequent user of exiftool that information did not come up when searching how to use it to change a file’s dates (or any other metadata for that matter).

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: Maik Qualmann<mailto:metzpinguin at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 1:22 PM
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source<mailto:digikam-users at kde.org>
Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] Updating raw file dates


Date modified and last accessed are not file metadata. The dates are stored in your file system. In the case of date metadata, it would certainly be possible to only change these within a RAW file if the date format is identical. But in fact, programs like Exiv2 or ExifTool rewrite all the metadata. Metadata is associated with pointers to next fields and needs to be updated.

This ExifTool FAQ explains it a bit:


https://exiftool.org/faq.html#Q13


Maik


Am Samstag, 15. Oktober 2022, 21:02:42 CEST schrieb Alan H:

> Thanks Maik. Just curious. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems apps change

> raw file date fields depending on modifications & last access. The blocks

> are already there and it is just the values that are changing. So, in a

> similar fashion, is really that dangerous to change to contents of other

> date fields, particularly date created (or whatever variation)? Aside from

> my own interest, would others (rhetorically asking) have a similar

> interest? In the change date/time feature could there be a toggle to

> include raw files?

>

> Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

>

> From: Maik Qualmann<mailto:metzpinguin at gmail.com>

> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2022 12:45 PM

> To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power

> of open source<mailto:digikam-users at kde.org> Subject: Re: [digiKam-users]

> Updating raw file dates

>

>

> Wait for digiKam-8.0.0, here it will be possible to enable ExifTool to write

> metadata.

>

> It is safer to edit RAW files with ExifTool.

>

>

> If you are keen to experiment and you make a backup of the database and your

> images,

>

> you can download an automatically created Windows digiKam-8.0.0 version

> here:

>

>

> https://binary-factory.kde.org/view/Windows%2064-bit/job/Digikam_Nightly_win

> 64/ (*.exe file)

>

>

> You have to do without HEIF support at the moment.

>

> Select ExifTool in the setup in the digiKam program directory under /bin.

>

>

> Maik

>

> Am Samstag, 15. Oktober 2022, 20:30:23 CEST schrieb Alan H:

> > I have a large collection of digitized slides and photos. Perhaps I should

> >

> > have thought of changing the camera’s date to the date the photo was

> > taken,

> >

> > but I didn’t. I have been using exiftool to change the dates for both jpg

> >

> > and raw photos with no ill effects (after 1000s) from editing a raw file’s

> >

> > date metadata.

> >

> >

> >

> > The work flow would be so much faster and convenient if I could do

> >

> > everything (captions, ratings, etc as well as dates) in digicam. I still

> >

> > have 1000s of photos to go. My experience though is that digicam will not

> >

> > update the raw file’s date metadata. It only writes it to a sidecar xmp.

> >

> >

> >

> > In the configuration settings there is a check box for writing to raw

> > files

> >

> > (“dangerous” it says). If I am only changing the value of a metadata

> >

> > block/field that is already present, could I just check that for when

> > dates

> >

> > are being edited and then change it back for everything else? Does “Exiv2

> >

> > library” work the same as exiftool for which I have never had a problem?

> >

> > Digikam 7.6.0, Windows 10. Thanks. Alan

> >

> >

> >

> > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20221016/c55b3012/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list