[digiKam-users] Tip for searching the mailing list archive

Phil philtuckey at free.fr
Tue Jan 18 11:12:28 GMT 2022


Hi

On duckduckgo the following search term gives better results:

site:mail.kde.org inurl:digikam-users dng

FWIW, this form is given in the Mailman FAQ:
https://wiki.list.org/DOC/How%20do%20I%20search%20the%20archives%20of%20the%20mailman-users%20mailing%20list%3F

I agree that the mailing list archive is a valuable resource, and 
searching it is hard/frustrating, as it is for mailman archives in general.

I suggest that information about how to search the archive is important 
enough to justify putting it on the "digiKam Support" page itself, 
https://www.digikam.org/support/, next to the link to the mailing list 
archive. For example something like:

Search the archive using the following search in usual search engines:
site:mail.kde.org inurl:digikam-users my search topic

It appears that mailman itself does not include a search engine for its 
archives, but sites can set up a separate search interface, such as 
mailman itself has:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
As far as I can see, kde does not have a search interface for the lists 
served on mail.kde.org. For example the kde lists support page:
https://kde.org/support/mailinglists/
points to the usual pipermail archive interface for the 22 years of the 
kde list:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/

(This message is not intended to be critical of anyone, just collecting 
information.)

On 18/01/2022 11:36, irthomasthomas at gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry, the working example link for searching "DNG" in the archive is
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fmail.kde.org%2Fpipermail%2Fdigikam-users%2F+dng 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fmail.kde.org%2Fpipermail%2Fdigikam-users%2F+dng>
> 
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, 10:31 irthomasthomas at gmail.com 
> <mailto:irthomasthomas at gmail.com>, <irthomasthomas at gmail.com 
> <mailto:irthomasthomas at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi, as a workaround to the missing mailing list search function, try
>     this query in your search engine: "site:url search term"
> 
>     E.g. to search stuff about DNG files:
> 
>     site:https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
>     <https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/> dng
> 
>     Google seems to have better results than DDG and Brave for this type
>     of query. D
>     I didn't try bing. E.g.
>     https://www.google.com/search?q=site:https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
>     <https://www.google.com/search?q=site:https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/>
>     dng
> 
>     On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, 10:15 frederic chaume,
>     <frederic.chaume at gmail.com <mailto:frederic.chaume at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         mailing list is fine for me, only missing from my point of view
>         is an efficient searching tool to retreive useful information ,
>         to get knowledge from already answered questions. There is a
>         link to access all the mails, classified by month , but unusable
>         for any search capabilities (as far as I know)
>           regards
> 
> 
> 
>         Le 18/01/2022 à 11:06, irthomasthomas at gmail.com
>         <mailto:irthomasthomas at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>         I also like this mailing list format. I think the empty forum
>>         simply reflects the digikam user demographics and preferences.
>>         Perhaps the mailing list promotion and onboarding can be
>>         improved instead?
>>
>>         Thanks to the team and everyone who contributes here.
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, 09:59 Stuart T Rogers,
>>         <stuart at stella-maris.org.uk
>>         <mailto:stuart at stella-maris.org.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>             I agree, I like the mailing list and the fact that we get
>>             responses from
>>             the developers on a regular basis. I also think that the
>>             mailing list
>>             gets better requests for information than many forums
>>             because people
>>             stop and think before posting a question because they know
>>             everyone on
>>             the list will see their update.
>>
>>             A forum has to be policed and that takes work which the
>>             developers
>>             cannot spend time on, it is also far more open to abuse
>>             and spam.
>>
>>             Stuart
>>
>>             On 18/01/2022 08:53, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
>>             > I am very much against using a forum. They are slower
>>             and take more
>>             > effort to read.
>>             >
>>             > Andrew
>>             >
>>             > On 18/01/2022 08:13, Jack Marxer wrote:
>>             >> I want to thank the digiKam developers for all the work
>>             they have done
>>             >> in developing and maintaining such a wonderful program!
>>             >>
>>             >> I also would like to use a forum, but I don't know if
>>             there is someone
>>             >> who would be willing to develop and maintain it.
>>             >> Jack Marxer
>>             >>
>>             >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:03 AM Ty Mayn
>>             <tyrus.mayn at gmail.com <mailto:tyrus.mayn at gmail.com>
>>             >> <mailto:tyrus.mayn at gmail.com
>>             <mailto:tyrus.mayn at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>             >>
>>             >>       After study of the public viewable archives I see
>>             that discussion
>>             >>     is more immediate on this oldfashioned Mailman
>>             listservice. Its
>>             >>     clear to me that it is small but has some
>>             responsive leaders with
>>             >>     knowledge.
>>             >>          Meanwhile the similarly named digikam Forum
>>             hosted by kde is
>>             >>     small and more inactive. After posting there this
>>             January I resorted
>>             >>     to answering my own posting just to be partially useful
>>             >> https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256
>>             <https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256>
>>             >>     <https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256
>>             <https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256>>
>>             >>           The energy on this list service deserves
>>             better tools.
>>             >> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
>>             <https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/>
>>             >>     <https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
>>             <https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/>>
>>             >>     The archive has at least 17 years of useful
>>             knowledge zipped into
>>             >>     204 separate months that no newcomer (or even old
>>             user)will easily
>>             >>     search.
>>             >>          Has anyone ever prepared and circulated a
>>             consolidated archive
>>             >>     ready for global search?
>>             >>       Every posting member has their  participating
>>             email exposed to
>>             >>     weak masking that only replaces @ with "at" while
>>             the  forum tools
>>             >>     at KDE have good authentication and member shelter.
>>             >>          Am I the only one to have spoken on this
>>             issue? I would have to
>>             >>     search the archives to know but I suppose each
>>             current member has a
>>             >>     view and every pattern has inertia.  Please accept
>>             this as a
>>             >>     positive input on a good thing
>>             >>     Ty Mayn
>>             >>
>>             >>
>>             >
>>             >
>>
>>             -- 
>>             Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk
>>             <https://www.stella-maris.org.uk>
>>             or:      https//www.broadstairs.org
>>             <http://www.broadstairs.org>
>>
> 


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list