[digiKam-users] advanced search criteria problem
frederic chaume
frederic.chaume at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 08:46:06 BST 2022
Hi Maik
thanks for your answer
in the result I have some pictures tagged with "red flag", and some
other tagged with "back color" or "white color". That's why I excluded
"red flag" and ad "no color" in the advanced search
below different scenarios
* criteria in advanced search: exclude "red flag" and no criteria for
color (as you mentioned):
o result is ok, but I have to select "no color" in the right side
filter to get the expected result
* criteria in advanced search: exclude "red flag" and set "no color"
criteria:
o result is inconsistent : some pictures with "red flag" or "black
color" are displayed. I have to exclude "red flag" and select
"no color" in the right side filter to get the expected result
* criteria in advanced search: "no color" criteria:
o result is ok, but I have to exclude "red flag" in the right side
filter to get the expected result
thanks
frederic
Le 05/04/2022 à 22:07, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
> The problem is with "no color". It's already fixed in Label sidebar. If you
> select "no color", the database entry is expected for "no color", but the
> query should also evaluate empty entries as "no color". If you want "no color"
> images in the search, don't select anything.
>
> Maik
>
> Am Dienstag, 5. April 2022, 14:49:00 CEST schrieb frederic chaume:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm trying to create some advanced search, but I'm facing some problems
>> I'm setting differents criteria (name, date, stars, size) and result is
>> correct.
>> If I set criteria on the flags , it is also correct (rejecting red flag)
>> but when I set flag criteria (exclude red flag) AND color criteria
>> (keep only no color) then result is inconsistant , meaning I see in the
>> result , some pictures with red flag and some others with color code.
>> So I need to add additional filter in the right side panel
>> Any suggestions?
>> (I'm using DK7.6 on win10)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Frederic
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20220406/e52b4415/attachment.htm>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list