[digiKam-users] ghost faces markings
KRODER Gerhard
gerdst1 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 21:08:48 BST 2021
ok,
* i have active this option:
* i re-read from albums and form
but i started on all images, before i read your messag. This took very
long, not interactable, finally did not recover, so i killed process.
Now i do not see unreasonbel, multiple faces markings, bu many face
markings beeing misplaced, like on knee, half face only, way too wide or
to small, or switched between persons on same image.
any way to clean up without running all new again, and revert to a
correct state?
Am 25.06.2021 um 05:50 schrieb Maik Qualmann:
> No, not the maintenance tool. In the digiKam metadata settings there is an
> option to clean up the database when the metadata is read in again.
> Now read the metadata again for the corresponding images via the item menu or
> via the album menu.
>
> Maik
>
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juni 2021, 23:20:59 CEST schrieben Sie:
>> ok, tnx. I see... there wher no metadata activated for beeing written
>>
>> :( guess i disabled it at start, not knowing what i did...
>>
>> But i do not quite understand how to "read in the image metadata again
>> with the temporary
>> activation of the database cleanup". OK, menu Maintanance, cleanup
>> database, core and additionals (faces, at least), and sync metadata with
>> db... i hope not to loose any other infomations....
>>
>> Am 24.06.2021 um 22:16 schrieb Maik Qualmann:
>>> This problem arises when face markings are already present in the image
>>> metadata, but digiKam is configured in such a way that no face metadata is
>>> written into the images. Then the face regions are doubled in the wrong
>>> position. You have to read in the image metadata again with the temporary
>>> activation of the database cleanup.
>>>
>>> Maik
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juni 2021, 19:23:41 CEST schrieb KRODER Gerhard:
>>>> Hei,
>>>>
>>>> i accidentially managed to rotate several faces views (by a keyboard
>>>> shortcut), and while finding, out what happened, and trying to recover
>>>> (at the end by auto-rotate all to exif information), i noticed there
>>>> are many ghost faces markings, i.e. additional markings in some images.
>>>> Those do not marking any face, sometimes there is just one, somtimes
>>>> many additional faces markings. I did nevernotice such ghost markings
>>>> before.
>>>>
>>>> I did a short crosscheck on a not intersecting, other faces collection,
>>>> and did not find any ghost markings there.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyon have a idea, how this may happen, and how to clean up? It
>>>> would be heavy to check all images of this faces colletion manually.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Gerhard
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210625/b8105f4f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: oogchdgaphoinfin.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1365 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210625/b8105f4f/attachment.png>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list