[digiKam-users] Face recognition speed?
KRODER Gerhard
gerdst1 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 16 17:46:55 BST 2021
Hello,
is this still true with dk 7.3? I run a faces re-detection of all images
(~20000), now for more 2 days, and about 16% of all images have been
processed untill now. 3200 Images in more than 48h, gives a average rate
of 66.7 images an hour, or 1.1 per minute. (ok, few videos ar processed,
also) There must be something wrong...? Anything to change with Setup?
i use dk7.3 tar fow win64, customized setup (appdata on external USB, as
i did before with dk 7.2, SQLlite DB, OpenCL on)
Cheers, Gerhard.
Am 14.05.2021 um 09:43 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, the work on all processors needs optimizations. It's planned for
> this summer where a student must work on this topic.
>
> Also, we voluntarily disable the GPU computations with OpenCV backend
> used in the background to perform DNN operations. It's planned to
> reactivate it in the future.
>
> There is also optimization to introduce in the data stream to
> database, which must be more grouped to reduce database calls.
>
> Gilles caulier
>
>
>
> Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 09:33, bsw <Brian.S.Watson at gmail.com
> <mailto:Brian.S.Watson at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new here. I used Adobe Lightroom for several years
> semi-professionally.
> Been using Google photos more recently just for the convenience.
> Want to
> remove my Google dependence so upgraded my NAS and am looking for
> local
> management tools. digiKam looks great and am very happy so far,
> but, I have
> a question about the performance of the face scanning...
>
> I'm running 7.2.0 on Windows on a "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU
> @ 1.80GHz
> 1.99 GHz" with 16GB of RAM. Photo library is on a NAS LAN (not WiFi)
> attached with about 120MB/s sustained read performance. digiKam
> database is
> (obviously) on local storage which is SSD.
>
> I have read a little here about face recognition so have selected
> the YOLO
> v3 detection model with the default 70% sensitivity and "Work on all
> processor cores" enabled.
>
> I've run a few tests and "Scan for Faces" on an album takes about
> 20 seconds
> per image. At that rate it's going to take 65 hours to scan my
> 12,374 image
> personal library.
>
> Is this expected or am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
> <http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210716/bc2953bd/attachment.htm>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list