<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>is this still true with dk 7.3? I run a faces re-detection of all
images (~20000), now for more 2 days, and about 16% of all images
have been processed untill now. 3200 Images in more than 48h,
gives a average rate of 66.7 images an hour, or 1.1 per minute.
(ok, few videos ar processed, also) There must be something
wrong...? Anything to change with Setup?</p>
<p>i use dk7.3 tar fow win64, customized setup (appdata on external
USB, as i did before with dk 7.2, SQLlite DB, OpenCL on)<br>
</p>
<p>Cheers, Gerhard.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 14.05.2021 um 09:43 schrieb Gilles
Caulier:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHFG6sGRB63RaGb9ksYL-CoM_eTeQ5BHc6eNh0pUdHM=RiNUWg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yes, the work on all processors needs optimizations. It's
planned for this summer where a student must work on this
topic.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Also, we voluntarily disable the GPU computations with
OpenCV backend used in the background to perform DNN
operations. It's planned to reactivate it in the future.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There is also optimization to introduce in the data stream
to database, which must be more grouped to reduce database
calls.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gilles caulier<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 09:33,
bsw <<a href="mailto:Brian.S.Watson@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">Brian.S.Watson@gmail.com</a>> a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I'm new here. I used Adobe Lightroom for several years
semi-professionally. <br>
Been using Google photos more recently just for the
convenience. Want to<br>
remove my Google dependence so upgraded my NAS and am looking
for local<br>
management tools. digiKam looks great and am very happy so
far, but, I have<br>
a question about the performance of the face scanning...<br>
<br>
I'm running 7.2.0 on Windows on a "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U
CPU @ 1.80GHz <br>
1.99 GHz" with 16GB of RAM. Photo library is on a NAS LAN
(not WiFi)<br>
attached with about 120MB/s sustained read performance.
digiKam database is<br>
(obviously) on local storage which is SSD.<br>
<br>
I have read a little here about face recognition so have
selected the YOLO<br>
v3 detection model with the default 70% sensitivity and "Work
on all<br>
processor cores" enabled.<br>
<br>
I've run a few tests and "Scan for Faces" on an album takes
about 20 seconds<br>
per image. At that rate it's going to take 65 hours to scan
my 12,374 image<br>
personal library.<br>
<br>
Is this expected or am I doing something wrong?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Brian<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Sent from: <a
href="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>