[digiKam-users] Future of digiKam bundles...

[neinei at gmx.net]

Thanks and Congrats :-)

On 29/05/2020 12:29, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Done !!!
>
> digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub :
>
> https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam
>
> Best
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 17:49, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository soon :
>>
>> https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 15:09, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Another important point : the Flatpak do not include yet the
>>> application translations files. It's relevant by the missing
>>> sunversion executable on the KDE server.
>>>
>>> And yes, all translations team from KDE project still to use
>>> subversion to host i18n data.
>>>
>>> As whole KDE migrate progressively from an own git/svn servers to
>>> gitlab, i read that i18n will also migrate to git in the near future.
>>> So wait and see...
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 12:04, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just updated the Flatpak notice page on digikam source repository :
>>>>
>>>> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak
>>>>
>>>> digiKam Flatpak is now compiled with ALL non-deprecated options,
>>>> including Web services using KIO. Look like the application resume is
>>>> well documented now, with plenty of screenshots.
>>>>
>>>> By non deprecated, i want mean the 2 ones : Baloo and Akonady
>>>> supports. Both make a mess with digiKam (especially Baloo).
>>>>
>>>> As i read, Flatpak is able to notify users when a new version is
>>>> published. I don't yet verified if it work well.
>>>>
>>>> On Flatpak, it's possible to rate and review the application. So don't
>>>> hesitate to promote the application.
>>>>
>>>> My best
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>> Hi all users,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would to give some feedback about the digiKam bundles migration advance...
>>>>>
>>>>> The current files provided by the project are listed below :
>>>>>
>>>>> - Linux AppImage 64 bits
>>>>> - Linux AppImage 32 bits
>>>>> - Macos Package installer 64 bits (based on Macports)
>>>>> - Windows installer 64 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW)
>>>>> - Windows installer 32 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW)
>>>>>
>>>>> Current problems for these bundles are listed below :
>>>>>
>>>>> - AppImage : not signed, do not support KIO extensions, do not support
>>>>> ICU (language extension), not published on official repository.
>>>>> - MacOS package : It's not relocatable, even if MacOS support well
>>>>> this feature. I don't found the time to finalize yet the install
>>>>> relocation support in bash script. Package is not published on MacOS
>>>>> store.
>>>>> - MXE Windows installer : not signed, not published on Windows store.
>>>>> Do not support KIO extension.
>>>>>
>>>>> But we have a new one starting to work and i working on : FlatPak
>>>>>
>>>>> This one is signed, published of official repository automatically
>>>>> (you can install it on Discover application for ex). It support ICU
>>>>> and KIO too... FlatPak is compiled on KDE infrastructure nightly and
>>>>> automatically. Only a 64 bits version is supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> This want mean that AppImage end of life is near. We will still
>>>>> publish officially the AppImage until 7.0.0, but later, if FlatPak do
>>>>> the job as well, AppImage will be dropped...
>>>>>
>>>>> For Windows, all the digiKam code compile fine under Microsoft Visual
>>>>> C++ compiler. This is the goal to obtain a signed and published
>>>>> version on Microsoft store. You can imagine that Microsoft will only
>>>>> support the official Windows compiler, and not GCC to permit to sign
>>>>> and publish application on the store. Don't forget, Microsoft is well
>>>>> Closed Source (:=))))
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft compiler is just the hell. It slow and require a Windows
>>>>> operating system. The current cross compilation solution that we use
>>>>> work fully under Linux, and compilation time are reduced by 4/5 ! A
>>>>> full Linux Workflow is a non virus guaranty !
>>>>>
>>>>> The Visual C++ workflow is also only available on 64 bits and is
>>>>> computed on KDE infrastructure, but the installer compilation is
>>>>> broken due to a weird configuration on KDE infrastructure. I currently
>>>>> try to found a work around.
>>>>>
>>>>> Personalty, i don't want to left MXE solution for the moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> For MacOS, the KDE infrastructure based on Craft compilation framework
>>>>> will be a solution to sing and publish a relocatable package for
>>>>> Apple. digiKam do not compile yet due to  missing dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Voilà, i hope to be enough clear with these technical points.
>>>>>
>>>>> My best
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier