[digiKam-users] Tags management

[Ramnarayan.K]

I agree with what Rod' says and my use is also the same - to help maintain
scientific classification of biodiversity pictures.

Ram
PS - New on the darktable list but unable to post queries so wondering if
this gets through

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:00, <ron.orenstein at rogers.com> wrote:

> I find the tree structure useful, if only to avoid having an extremely
> long list of tags to scroll through (much of my tag structure is for
> wildlife and use a heirarchical scientific classification (eg
> animals>insects>lepidoptera>nymphalidae>nymphalinae). Usually I manually
> tag the photo with all of these levels, combined with other tags for
> locality. It depends on your preference, of course, but if all these tags
> are applied they will all appear in an export, if not in tree order.
>
> Ronald Orenstein 1825 Shady Creek Court Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2 Canada
> ronorenstein.blogspot.com
> On Jul 24, 2020, 10:24 AM -0400, jdd at dodin.org <jdd at dodin.org>, wrote:
>
> Le 24/07/2020 à 14:28, Cesar Inacio Martins a écrit :
>
> 2) I'm reorganizing into a tree structure, merging someones, moving others.
>
>
> I never do this. more precisely, I use a flat tag structure with names
> and subnames (Toulouse, Toulouse-Capitole, Toulouse-Capitole-facade...)
>
> mostly because tree view is not portable, for example, I don't think web
> galleries do support it
>
> jdd
>
>
> --
> http://dodin.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20200724/0f70f4be/attachment.htm>